- Why do ergonomic requirements still continue to be regarded as optional extras in machinery design?
- Why in Type C standards the subject of ergonomics is not yet firmly enough established?
- How could practical experience gained by users be made available to the standards committees systematically?
- Do buyers make sufficiently clear to their suppliers that they need and want ergonomically well designed machinery?
In our view, there is evidence of a lack of communication between ergonomists, manufacturers, users, authorities and standardization experts.
The primary purpose of this website is, therefore, to provide a platform for discussion on ergonomics issues of machinery design.
Do you agree? If so, what are your expectations from such a platform? Do you consider helpful the information and solutions already present on this site?
Please contribute with your opinion! Use the link above to leave a reply, or the comments field that you can find at the bottom of each page of this Website.
See also ErgoMach on LinkedIn!